CALL FOR PAPERSVolume 2Issue 3Submit Research
PEER-REVIEWED • OPEN ACCESS • ESTABLISHED 2014

Advancing
Research Through
Open Knowledge

The Indian Journal of Contemporary Legal and Social Issues publishes rigorous, accessible scholarship at the intersection of law, society, technology, and governance.

Environmental Law
From Planning To Pollution: Environmental Degrada...
Akanksha
Environmental Law8 min
Constitutional Law
Autonomous Governance Under The Indian Constituti...
Samhita Anil Adya
Constitutional Law8 min
Property Law/Civil Procedure
When Property Has No Owner: A Jurisprudential Ana...
Sourav Kar
Property Law/Civil Procedure8 min
Corporate Law
Corporate Insolvency Resolution In India: A Criti...
Dr. E. Ramya
Corporate Law8 min
Civil Procedure/ADR
Case Comment On Dr. C.P. Sreekumar V. S.Ramanujan
Mayuresh Jaiswal
Civil Procedure/ADR8 min
Public Health
Hunger Strike As A Form Of Protest: Bodily Autono...
Tanya Bansal
Public Health8 min
Public Health
Judicial Intervention In Maternity Protections: A...
Ms. Pallavi Yashwant Pawar
Public Health8 min
LIVE RESEARCH • 67 PAPERS
WHY PUBLISH WITH IJCLSI

A publishing platform
built for serious scholarship.

01

Fast, Rigorous Review

Average first decision in 18 days. Every paper receives detailed, constructive feedback from leading scholars. Our process is transparent and respected for its fairness.

18 days
to first decision
02

Visibility Without Compromise

Papers are indexed in 15+ major databases. They are regularly cited in policy reports, court judgments, and leading international media. Reach that actually matters.

15+
academic databases
03

True Open Access

Immediate, permanent open access under CC-BY. Authors retain full copyright. No paywalls for readers. No APC barriers for authors from the Global South.

100%
open access
04

Real Metrics & Lasting Impact

Transparent download and citation data. Author dashboards. Institutional reports. We measure what actually advances careers and fields.

Real
impact data
FOR AUTHORS

Publishing at IJCLSI is clear, fair, and fast.

Your Submissions

Track review status in your author dashboard

Live preview

Digital Due Process and the Right to Explanation

Under Review
Submitted Jan 9, 2025Updated 2 days ago

Land Rights in the Era of Carbon Markets

Revision Requested
Submitted Nov 28, 2024Updated Jan 11

Judicial Review of Automated Welfare Systems

Accepted
Submitted Oct 14, 2024Updated Dec 19

Average first decision in 18 days

Research Areas

Browse scholarship by paper category across contemporary legal fields.

Technology Law
AI governance, data protection, and platform regulation
4 papers
Constitutional Law
Fundamental rights, federalism, and judicial review
3 papers
Environmental Law
Climate litigation, biodiversity, and pollution control
3 papers
Gender Justice/Labour Law
Gender Justice scholarship in the IJCLSI catalogue
3 papers
Public Health
Health Law scholarship in the IJCLSI catalogue
3 papers
Family Law
Family Law scholarship in the IJCLSI catalogue
2 papers
Civil Procedure/ADR
ADR scholarship in the IJCLSI catalogue
1 papers
Constitutional Law/Human Rights
Constitutional Law scholarship in the IJCLSI catalogue
1 papers

Latest Publications

August 2026

View all →
Property Law/Civil Procedure

When Property Has No Owner: A Jurisprudential Analysis With Reference To Indian Legal System And Contemporary Frontiers

The law of property ordinarily presupposes the existence of an identifiable owner who possesses a bundle of enforceable rights, including its title. The concept of ownerless property challenges this assumption by raising the question that what happens when no person can establish a legally recognised proprietary claim. The very concept was first evolved in ancient Rome and afterwards spread throughout the Europe and Common Law Countries. From this concept of ownerless property today’s modern concept of bona vacantia, escheat, abandonment, unclaimed and lapse properties have been derived. Article 296 of the Constitution of India recognised acquisition of property by escheat, lapse or bona vacantia. However, ownerless property remains conceptually fragmented across property, succession, constitutional, corporate and administrative jurisprudence. This article examines the jurisprudential foundations of ownerless property, distinguishes bona vacantia from escheat and abandoned property, analyses the constitutional position under Article 296 and Article 300A, evaluates the role of the judiciary. Applying the Analytical Doctrinal Legal Research and using Primary and Secondary data sources it argues that the mere absence of a claim should not automatically be equated with absence of ownership. A legally regulated determination of ownerlessness, accompanied by procedural safeguards and mechanisms for restoration to subsequently established owners, is necessary to reconcile State sovereignty with private property rights.

Sourav Kar
8 min 2
Corporate Law

Corporate Insolvency Resolution In India: A Critical Analysis Of The Insolvency And Bankruptcy Code, 2016

The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) represents a significant change in India's approach to corporate financial distress. Before its enactment, corporate insolvency framework in India was fragmented across different statutes and institutional mechanisms, including the Companies Act 2013, which contained provisions relating to corporate winding-up, the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act 1985 and various debt-recovery mechanisms. The earlier framework was characterised by delays, multiplicity of proceedings and institutional fragmentation, which frequently contributed to the erosion of value in distressed enterprises. The IBC initiated a consolidated and time-bound framework centred on resolution rather than immediate liquidation, with the objectives of maximising asset value, promoting entrepreneurship and availability of credit and balancing the interests of stakeholders. This paper critically examines corporate insolvency resolution under the IBC 2016, with particular emphasis on the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP), moratorium, Committee of Creditors (CoC), insolvency professionals, resolution plans, valuation and liquidation. It further evolves judicial interpretation concerning the commercial wisdom of the CoC and evaluates the practical effectiveness of the Code through available institutional data. The analysis demonstrates that the IBC has significantly changed creditor-debtor behaviour and created a more coherent framework for corporate distress. However, delays in admission and resolution, institutional constraints, value erosion, valuation concerns and difficulties in implementing approved resolution plans continue to affect its effectiveness. This paper discusses that the future of insolvency law in India should focus not merely on increasing the number of resolutions but on ensuring timely, commercially viable and sustainable corporate revival.

Dr. E. Ramya
8 min 8

Ready to publish work that matters?

Join thousands of researchers who have chosen IJCLSI for rigorous review, open access, and lasting impact.

Average first decision: 18 days