CALL FOR PAPERSVolume 2Issue 3Submit Research
PEER-REVIEWED • OPEN ACCESS • ESTABLISHED 2014

Advancing
Research Through
Open Knowledge

The Indian Journal of Contemporary Legal and Social Issues publishes rigorous, accessible scholarship at the intersection of law, society, technology, and governance.

Technology Law
The Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023 An...
Dr. Prashant Yadav
Technology Law8 min
Constitutional Law
HUMAN TRAFFICKING IN INDIA: A COMPARATIVE ASSESSM...
Ragini Singh
Constitutional Law8 min
Public Health
T. Sandhiya & K. Rajesh Kumar - Women’s Safety La...
T. Sandhiya
Public Health8 min
Public Health
Misapplication Of The POSCO Act: Adolescent Conse...
Dr. Prashant Yadav
Public Health8 min
Gender Justice/Labour Law
Women's Safety Laws In India: Constitutional Pers...
M. Divyapriya
Gender Justice/Labour Law8 min
Technology Law
Cyber Crime And Information Technology Act 2000 I...
S. Naveen
Technology Law8 min
Family Law
Marital Rape And Women's Bodily Autonomy: A Const...
Anmol Mahajan
Family Law8 min
LIVE RESEARCH • 53 PAPERS
WHY PUBLISH WITH IJCLSI

A publishing platform
built for serious scholarship.

01

Fast, Rigorous Review

Average first decision in 18 days. Every paper receives detailed, constructive feedback from leading scholars. Our process is transparent and respected for its fairness.

18 days
to first decision
02

Visibility Without Compromise

Papers are indexed in 15+ major databases. They are regularly cited in policy reports, court judgments, and leading international media. Reach that actually matters.

15+
academic databases
03

True Open Access

Immediate, permanent open access under CC-BY. Authors retain full copyright. No paywalls for readers. No APC barriers for authors from the Global South.

100%
open access
04

Real Metrics & Lasting Impact

Transparent download and citation data. Author dashboards. Institutional reports. We measure what actually advances careers and fields.

Real
impact data
FOR AUTHORS

Publishing at IJCLSI is clear, fair, and fast.

Your Submissions

Track review status in your author dashboard

Live preview

Digital Due Process and the Right to Explanation

Under Review
Submitted Jan 9, 2025Updated 2 days ago

Land Rights in the Era of Carbon Markets

Revision Requested
Submitted Nov 28, 2024Updated Jan 11

Judicial Review of Automated Welfare Systems

Accepted
Submitted Oct 14, 2024Updated Dec 19

Average first decision in 18 days

Research Areas

Browse scholarship by paper category across contemporary legal fields.

Technology Law
AI governance, data protection, and platform regulation
4 papers
Family Law
Family Law scholarship in the IJCLSI catalogue
3 papers
Public Health
Health Law scholarship in the IJCLSI catalogue
3 papers
Constitutional Law
Fundamental rights, federalism, and judicial review
2 papers
Criminal Law/Human Rights
Criminal Law scholarship in the IJCLSI catalogue
2 papers
Cyber Law/Data Privacy
Data Privacy scholarship in the IJCLSI catalogue
2 papers
Environmental Law
Climate litigation, biodiversity, and pollution control
2 papers
Constitutional Law/Family Law
Constitutional Law scholarship in the IJCLSI catalogue
1 papers

Latest Publications

August 2026

View all →
Technology Law

The Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023 And The Right To Privacy: A Critical Analysis Of India's New Data Protection Regime

The Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023, read with the Digital Personal Data Protection Rules, 2025 notified on 13 November 2025, constitutes India's first comprehensive statutory framework for digital personal data. Anchored in the nine-judge Bench ruling in Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) v. Union of India that elevated informational privacy to a fundamental right under Article 21, the Act translates constitutional guarantees into obligations on Data Fiduciaries and rights of Data Principals. This paper critically examines whether the DPDP framework realises the Puttaswamy standards of legality, necessity and proportionality. It scrutinises the consent-centric architecture and 'legitimate uses' under Sections 4 to 7, the rights under Sections 11 to 14, the institutional design of the Data Protection Board of India, the breadth of State exemptions under Sections 7 and 17, the amendment to Section 8(1)(j) of the Right to Information Act, 2005 via Section 44(3), and the phased enforcement timeline culminating in full compliance on 13 May 2027. Drawing on comparative insights from the GDPR and the constitutional challenges pending before the Supreme Court, the paper argues that while the Act marks a decisive legislative advance, structural features, particularly expansive executive exemptions, limited regulatory independence, and the dilution of public-interest overrides, risk subordinating the right to privacy to administrative convenience and State surveillance imperatives. Meaningful realisation of constitutional privacy therefore requires robust judicial scrutiny and targeted legislative refinement.

Dr. Prashant Yadav
8 min
Public Health

Misapplication Of The POSCO Act: Adolescent Consensual Relationships And The Need For A Romeo And Juliet Exception

The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 establishes a strict-liability regime that treats every person below eighteen as a child and renders the minor's consent legally irrelevant to the commission of the offence.[1][2] While this design has undoubtedly strengthened the State's response to predatory sexual abuse, it has also produced a well-documented and recurring pattern of misapplication in cases involving consensual, age-proximate adolescent relationships, prosecutions that are frequently set in motion not by exploitation but by familial or community opposition to the relationship itself. Drawing on Madras High Court jurisprudence in Sabari v. Inspector of Police[3] and Vijayalakshmi v. State[4], together with the Supreme Court's post-script observations in State of Uttar Pradesh v. Anurudh (2026),[5] this paper argues that the continued absence of a close-in-age exception converts a child-protective statute into an instrument of private social control. Comparative Romeo-and-Juliet models and the Law Commission of India's 283rd Report (2023)[6] are examined to demonstrate that a carefully calibrated statutory exception, one bounded by age proximity, genuine consent, the absence of any relationship of authority or exploitation, and adequate procedural safeguards, is both constitutionally defensible and doctrinally overdue. The paper concludes that legislative introduction of such an exception is no longer a matter of policy preference but an institutional imperative flowing directly from the Supreme Court's own invitation to the Union Government.

Dr. Prashant Yadav
8 min

Ready to publish work that matters?

Join thousands of researchers who have chosen IJCLSI for rigorous review, open access, and lasting impact.

Average first decision: 18 days