CALL FOR PAPERSVolume 2Issue 3Submit Research
PEER-REVIEWED • OPEN ACCESS • ESTABLISHED 2014

Advancing
Research Through
Open Knowledge

The Indian Journal of Contemporary Legal and Social Issues publishes rigorous, accessible scholarship at the intersection of law, society, technology, and governance.

Public Health
Judicial Intervention In Maternity Protections: A...
Ms. Pallavi Yashwant Pawar
Public Health8 min
Gender Justice/Labour Law
CASE COMMENTARY ON A.K. KRAIPAK VS UNION OF IN...
Shruti Santha Kumar
Gender Justice/Labour Law8 min
International Law/Human Rights
Talking of Justice, Read Backwards: Leila Seth's ...
Diya Dange
International Law/Human Rights8 min
Technology Law
LEGAL CHALLENGES IN IMPLEMENTING DIGITAL TAXATION...
Harshitha S
Technology Law8 min
Gender Justice/Labour Law
Punishment Or Redemption? Reassessing The Death P...
Ayesha Nezami
Gender Justice/Labour Law8 min
Family Law
DOWRY, MARITAL VIOLENCE AND DOWRY DEATHS - THE LE...
Maitreyi Singh
Family Law8 min
Constitutional Law
HUMAN TRAFFICKING IN INDIA: A COMPARATIVE ASSESSM...
Ragini Singh
Constitutional Law8 min
LIVE RESEARCH • 60 PAPERS
WHY PUBLISH WITH IJCLSI

A publishing platform
built for serious scholarship.

01

Fast, Rigorous Review

Average first decision in 18 days. Every paper receives detailed, constructive feedback from leading scholars. Our process is transparent and respected for its fairness.

18 days
to first decision
02

Visibility Without Compromise

Papers are indexed in 15+ major databases. They are regularly cited in policy reports, court judgments, and leading international media. Reach that actually matters.

15+
academic databases
03

True Open Access

Immediate, permanent open access under CC-BY. Authors retain full copyright. No paywalls for readers. No APC barriers for authors from the Global South.

100%
open access
04

Real Metrics & Lasting Impact

Transparent download and citation data. Author dashboards. Institutional reports. We measure what actually advances careers and fields.

Real
impact data
FOR AUTHORS

Publishing at IJCLSI is clear, fair, and fast.

Your Submissions

Track review status in your author dashboard

Live preview

Digital Due Process and the Right to Explanation

Under Review
Submitted Jan 9, 2025Updated 2 days ago

Land Rights in the Era of Carbon Markets

Revision Requested
Submitted Nov 28, 2024Updated Jan 11

Judicial Review of Automated Welfare Systems

Accepted
Submitted Oct 14, 2024Updated Dec 19

Average first decision in 18 days

Research Areas

Browse scholarship by paper category across contemporary legal fields.

Technology Law
AI governance, data protection, and platform regulation
5 papers
Family Law
Family Law scholarship in the IJCLSI catalogue
4 papers
Public Health
Health Law scholarship in the IJCLSI catalogue
4 papers
Gender Justice/Labour Law
Gender Justice scholarship in the IJCLSI catalogue
3 papers
Constitutional Law
Fundamental rights, federalism, and judicial review
2 papers
Environmental Law
Climate litigation, biodiversity, and pollution control
2 papers
International Law/Human Rights
Human Rights scholarship in the IJCLSI catalogue
2 papers
Constitutional Law/Human Rights
Constitutional Law scholarship in the IJCLSI catalogue
1 papers

Latest Publications

August 2026

View all →
Public Health

Judicial Intervention In Maternity Protections: Advancing Reproductive Justice And Economic Rights In India

Reproductive justice means being able to make informed decisions about one’s own body. Maternity leave and benefits are an important aspect of reproductive justice, as women are able to carry out a safe pregnancy and childbirth with dignity and without economic insecurity. In India, maternity benefits ensure job security, continuity of income and access to healthcare during and after pregnancy. India’s commitment to maternity protections can be seen through judicial interventions. The Supreme Court through landmark judgements such as Suchita Srivastava vs Chandigarh Administration, 2009, has recognized maternity leave as a facet of the right to life, health and personal liberty under Article 21 of the Constitution. More recently, in K. Umadevi vs State of Tamil Nadu, 2025, the court declared maternity leave and benefits to be a constitutional right, even beyond the two-child norm. Although maternity leave has been considered a fundamental right and given statutory protection under the Maternity Benefit Act, 1961, as amended in 2017, the Act primarily focuses on the formal sector and does not provide direct legal protection to working women in the informal sector. While courts in India have helped by recognizing maternity benefits as a basic right, challenges such as employer non-compliance, lack of awareness and workplace discrimination significantly reduce their effectiveness. There remains a clear gap between what the Constitution promises in terms of reproductive justice and what women, especially those working in the informal sector, actually experience in daily lives. This paper looks at whether judicial intervention has helped close this gap.

Ms. Pallavi Yashwant Pawar & Mr. Chinmay Madhav Pawar
8 min 1
Gender Justice/Labour Law

CASE COMMENTARY ON A.K. KRAIPAK VS UNION OF INDIA, (1969) 2 SCC 262 (M. Hidayatullah, J.M. Shelat, K.S. Hegde, A.N. Grover, and Vashishtha Bhargava)

In 1966, the Government of India established a new All-India Service known as the Indian Forest Service (IFS) under the All-India Services Act, 1951 (All India Services Act, 1951). To staff this newly created service, the Central Government framed the Indian Forest Service (Initial Recruitment) Regulations, 1966 (Indian Forest Service Regulations, 1966). These regulations outlined that senior, qualified officers already serving within the provincial State Forest Services would be selected and integrated into the federal IFS cadre. It is worth noting that the IFS was the third All-India Service to be created, following the Indian Administrative Service and the Indian Police Service, and its formation reflected a broader post-Independence policy of bringing provincial cadres under a unified national framework to standardise administrative and technical governance. This centralising rationale explains why lateral entrants from the State Forest Services, such as the officers competing before the Special Selection Board in this case, had such a strong stake in how the initial recruitment exercise was conducted, since selection to the IFS carried significant career and status implications.[1] For State of J&K, a special selection board had been constituted to hold interview of the candidates, to evaluate their service record and prepare a merit list of the recommended officers for Central Civil Services Commission. This Selection Board consisted of many senior officers, one of whom was the Acting Chief Conservator of Forests for Jammu & Kashmir, Naqishbund. A serious conflict of interest situation arose because Naqishbund was not just a selector but an applicant too. He was one of the state cadre officers seeking a permanent, coveted slot in the initial recruitment selection list for the newly formed IFS. Despite this glaring overlap of roles, Naqishbund was appointed to and remained an active member of the Special Selection Board tasked with choosing the best officers from his own state.

Shruti Santha Kumar
8 min 1
Technology Law

LEGAL CHALLENGES IN IMPLEMENTING DIGITAL TAXATION FRAMEWORKS

The rapid expansion of the digital economy has exposed structural limitations in traditional international and domestic tax frameworks. Digital businesses can generate substantial economic value in jurisdictions without maintaining a conventional physical presence, challenging established concepts of nexus, permanent establishment and source-based taxation. This paper examines the principal legal challenges in implementing digital taxation frameworks, with particular attention to India, the European Union and the United States, and evaluates their relationship with the OECD/G20 Inclusive Framework and the Two-Pillar Solution. The study follows a doctrinal legal research approach. It analyses legislation, judicial decisions, tax treaties, government and institutional materials, scholarly literature and international initiatives concerning digital taxation. The study focuses on the evolution of digital taxation, unilateral measures such as India's Equalisation Levy and European Digital Services Taxes, Significant Economic Presence, jurisdictional conflicts, compliance and enforcement problems, and the role of artificial intelligence, blockchain, big-data analytics and automation in tax administration. The analysis indicates that the principal difficulties are jurisdictional ambiguity, fragmented unilateral measures, double-taxation risks, compliance burdens, treaty interaction, enforcement across borders, data governance and the rapid emergence of new digital business models. The OECD's Two-Pillar framework offers a route toward greater international coordination, but implementation requires sustained cooperation, domestic legislative alignment and effective administrative capacity. The paper recommends harmonised legal definitions, coordinated international rules, simplified compliance, stronger data-protection safeguards, technologyassisted enforcement with due-process protections, and adaptive regulation for emerging digital sectors.

Harshitha S
8 min 8

Ready to publish work that matters?

Join thousands of researchers who have chosen IJCLSI for rigorous review, open access, and lasting impact.

Average first decision: 18 days