CALL FOR PAPERSVolume 2Issue 4Submit Research
PEER-REVIEWED • OPEN ACCESS • ESTABLISHED 2014

Advancing
Research Through
Open Knowledge

The Indian Journal of Contemporary Legal and Social Issues publishes rigorous, accessible scholarship at the intersection of law, society, technology, and governance.

Cyber Law/Defamation
Freedom Of Speech In The Internet Era: A Comparat...
Sivaraj S
Cyber Law/Defamation8 min
Public Health
Local Self-Governance And Grassroots Democracy In...
Dr. Bhavana Sharma
Public Health8 min
Constitutional Law
Mapping The Contours Of Judicial Review : A Compa...
Ankita Rani Mishra
Constitutional Law8 min
Cyber Law/Defamation
Platformed Persuasion: Influencer Marketing And C...
A. Preethi
Cyber Law/Defamation8 min
Criminal Law
Beyond The Abolition Of Sedition? A Critical Exam...
Manvi Adhikari
Criminal Law8 min
Constitutional Law
Intellectual Property And The Problem Of Collecti...
Dishi
Constitutional Law8 min
Criminal Law
THE ROLE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN CRIMINAL I...
Simran Sharma
Criminal Law8 min
LIVE RESEARCH • 77 PAPERS
INDEXED IN
ROAD (ISSN/UNESCO)•ResearchBib•Advanced Science Index•IP Indexing•ICI World of Journals•Scholar Article Journal Index•RJIF•IIJIF•SIF•IFSIJ•Root Indexing•I2OR•ROAD (ISSN/UNESCO)•ResearchBib•Advanced Science Index•IP Indexing•ICI World of Journals•Scholar Article Journal Index•RJIF•IIJIF•SIF•IFSIJ•Root Indexing•I2OR•
WHY PUBLISH WITH IJCLSI

A publishing platform
built for serious scholarship.

01

Fast, Rigorous Review

Average first decision in 18 days. Every paper receives detailed, constructive feedback from leading scholars. Our process is transparent and respected for its fairness.

18 days
to first decision
02

Visibility Without Compromise

Papers are indexed in 15+ major databases. They are regularly cited in policy reports, court judgments, and leading international media. Reach that actually matters.

15+
academic databases
03

True Open Access

Immediate, permanent open access under CC-BY. Authors retain full copyright. No paywalls for readers. No APC barriers for authors from the Global South.

100%
open access
04

Real Metrics & Lasting Impact

Transparent download and citation data. Author dashboards. Institutional reports. We measure what actually advances careers and fields.

Real
impact data
FOR AUTHORS

Publishing at IJCLSI is clear, fair, and fast.

Your Submissions

Track review status in your author dashboard

Live preview

Digital Due Process and the Right to Explanation

Under Review
Submitted Jan 9, 2025Updated 2 days ago

Land Rights in the Era of Carbon Markets

Revision Requested
Submitted Nov 28, 2024Updated Jan 11

Judicial Review of Automated Welfare Systems

Accepted
Submitted Oct 14, 2024Updated Dec 19

Average first decision in 18 days

Research Areas

Browse scholarship by paper category across contemporary legal fields.

Constitutional Law
Fundamental rights, federalism, and judicial review
4 papers
Public Health
Health Law scholarship in the IJCLSI catalogue
4 papers
Criminal Law
Evidence, sentencing, and criminal procedure
3 papers
Cyber Law/Defamation
Defamation scholarship in the IJCLSI catalogue
2 papers
Gender Justice/Labour Law
Gender Justice scholarship in the IJCLSI catalogue
2 papers
Civil Procedure/ADR
ADR scholarship in the IJCLSI catalogue
1 papers
Corporate Law
Governance, insolvency, and securities regulation
1 papers
Cyber Law/Contract Law
Contract Law scholarship in the IJCLSI catalogue
1 papers

Latest Publications

September 2026

View all →
Cyber Law/Defamation

Freedom Of Speech In The Internet Era: A Comparative Legal Analysis Of The Indian Digital Public Square

The transition from analog to digital telecommunications has fundamentally disrupted traditional speech jurisprudence. While early internet discourse celebrated a decentralized, boundaryless forum for expression, modern online communication is mediated by centralized platform monopolies and heavily regulated by sovereign states. This research paper investigates the legal and constitutional dimensions of digital free speech in India under Article 19(1)(a) and the reasonable restrictions of Article 19(2) of the Constitution of India. It critically examines the shift from statutory safe harbour protections under Section 79 of the Information Technology Act, 2000, to proactive state-mandated censorship frameworks under the IT Rules of 2021 and 2023. Through a comparative legal analysis involving the United States' First Amendment doctrine through Section 230 CDA and the European Union’s co-regulatory framework (Digital Services Act, 2022), this paper identifies structural vulnerabilities in Indian digital governance. It concludes with actionable legislative, regulatory, and judicial reforms designed to protect constitutional speech in an increasingly algorithmic digital ecosystem.

Sivaraj S et al.
8 min 4
Public Health

Local Self-Governance And Grassroots Democracy In Himachal Pradesh: A Socio-Legal Analysis

Local self-government is the first step and strong basis for democratic decentralization especially in India which is a country of diversity. And therefore, Panchayati Raj Institutions introduced by 73 rd Constitutional Amendment has played a very crucial role in the transformation of rural governance by promoting participatory democracy, accountability, and grassroots development. And especially in the hilly geography of Himachal Pradesh which have diverse geographical conditions, cultural diversity and diverse socio-economic conditions , the study of successful implementation of PRIs becomes the more crucial. In this study, the researcher has tries to examine and understand the Panchayati Raj Institutions in the hill state of Himachal Pradesh from different aspects. And the emphasis is on the study of democratic participation, women’s representation, developmental challenges, and institutional limitations. And for this study, the researcher have adopted an empirical and socio-legal methodology where 150 respondents were selected among Panchayat representatives, local residents, and youth participants from selected districts of Himachal Pradesh. And for the secondary data, the researcher has followed constitutional provisions, government reports, scholarly literature, and judicial decisions. And it is clear from this study that PTIs have improved political participation and local accountability to a great extent but still there are challenges relating to financial dependence, limited administrative autonomy, political interference, and lack of awareness are hampering the institutional effectiveness . And this study suggests that efforts should be made to strengthen fiscal decentralization, digital governance, institutional transparency, and civic awareness for ensuring effective grassroots democracy in Himachal Pradesh.

Dr. Bhavana Sharma
8 min 2
Constitutional Law

Mapping The Contours Of Judicial Review : A Comparative Analysis Of The UK, USA, France And India

Judicial review is one of the core constitutional features that lays the foundations of the supremacy of the Constitution, the rule of law, and protection of individual rights, by allowing courts to review the legality and constitutionality of legislative and executive decisions and actions. Its scope, nature and constitutional bases vary however, significantly in different legal systems. This article compares judicial review in the United Kingdom, the United States, France and India, looking at the history, constitution, institutions and practice of each. The United Kingdom has a doctrine of parliamentary sovereignty and limited judicial review principles, as opposed to those of the United States which are very strong in constitutional judicial review principles, with judicial precedent as the basis. The Basic Structure Doctrine has expanded and made the judicial review system in Indian Constitution dynamic and strong, while in France it is a centralized constitutional review system through the Constitutional Council. Despite the variations in judicial review from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, the study shows that it is an essential tool for upholding constitutionalism, holding government to account, and protecting democratic governance.

Ankita Rani Mishra
8 min 10
Cyber Law/Defamation

Platformed Persuasion: Influencer Marketing And Consumer Protection Law In India

The rapid growth of social media has transformed advertising into a subtle, personality-driven exercise, where influencers act as powerful intermediaries between brands and consumers. This phenomenon, often described as platformed persuasion , blurs the traditional distinction between personal opinion and commercial communication. In India, the regulatory response to influencer marketing has evolved primarily through the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, supplemented by the Consumer Protection (E-Commerce) Rules, 2020 and the Advertising Standards Council of India (ASCI) Guidelines for Influencer Advertising in Digital Media. This paper critically examines the adequacy of India’s consumer protection framework in addressing deceptive and misleading practices arising from influencer-led promotions. It analyses the statutory recognition of misleading advertisements, the introduction of endorser liability, and the shifting burden of responsibility from advertisers to digital intermediaries and individual influencers. The study also explores enforcement challenges posed by the decentralised and algorithm-driven nature of social media platforms, including issues of disclosure, transparency, and jurisdiction. By situating influencer marketing within broader principles of consumer autonomy and informed choice, the paper argues that while existing laws mark a significant step forward, gaps remain in effective monitoring, deterrence, and accountability. The paper concludes by suggesting the need for clearer statutory definitions, stronger coordination between regulatory bodies, and a more nuanced approach to balancing commercial speech with consumer rights in the digital marketplace.

A. Preethi
8 min 11

Ready to publish work that matters?

Join thousands of researchers who have chosen IJCLSI for rigorous review, open access, and lasting impact.

Average first decision: 18 days